First of all let me express my serious doubts whether in fact you are Gaurav or somebody with vested interests posing as him from the SIF brigade or wherever.. The reasons are threefold.

1) My name is ‘Kaveetaa’ and not ‘Kavitha’. Only a south Indian would spell it this way which Gaurav is not. In fact in all of his earlier posts he has referred to me as Kaveetaji.

2) The tone of the comment is most unlike Gaurav who has always come across as fairly reasonable.

3) The ip address is from Mumbai. Gaurav was in Delhi or then in Bangalore.

So without a shred of doubt let me demolish your claim of being Gaurav.

Now coming to your arbitrary and unreasonable comment.I dont know either Gaurav or Tripti from Adams and neither am I a represenatative of any feminist, non feminist, family saving group. The sole purpose was to present the story sine qua non and without any motive, whatsoever. It does not benefit me in any manner to lambast Gaurav or protect Tripti and which is amply clear if you un biasedly read ALL of my comments and the original post.

Gaurav merely claimed that he had filed the case on Tripti before she did. I repeatedly requested him to furnish details like case no, date, place of admission etc which he HAS NOT furnished.

Now why are you ( whoever you are) and whatever your motive of coming here almost 8-10 months after the said episode may i ask you why are you not ready to digest the truth that there seems to be some kind of covert untruth in operation here?

I am sure whatever information I will provide you will ask for more & portray like I am not giving the information.
If you read all my post here, you will find that I have given all the information asked by you.
Why you are not ready to digest that?

You have to accept that here the laws are being misused by Tripti.

-Gaurav

The quality of evidence that is there for disproving the statement that “wipro gave dating allowance ” is unshakable and beyond reasonable doubt.

Court of law is only one of the forums for proving.

This is good example on the ridiculous extent of false claims that are being made in the Indian courts

It is however your perogative take a stance that “wipro must have given dating allowance”

I would however have to comment that this is not a reasonable stance to take.

Please dont be ridiculous.. I asked for substantiation not ‘claims’ .

If a modicum of decorum is not maintained, your posts will be deleted.

Simple Allegations

1. Wipro gives dating allowance

Refution

1. By wipro
2. Hr policies
3. By ex wipro employees. I am one of them

is sufficient to prove that the person made a false allegation .

The fact that this person is educated is sufficient to proove that she cannot be deluded

But there are following why men do not file divorce case.

1. Men are re-abused in the court system
2. Every man who files for divorce case faces a jail for some time using a false dowry case.
3. The learned practical experience without paying a reverse dowry a dicroce is not given
4. It takes our courts upto 14 - 20 years to grant by that time it loses its meaninig. What use is a divorce to a 50 year old man which was use when the man was in 30s
5. Social responsibility : such women should not be allowed to spoil some other mens life.
6. Divorce is nothing but a paper allowing you to be remarried . The men who may be going through such horific experience may not be intrested in marrying in other words divorce has not meaning such
7. They are cut from the children . Indian legal system is notorious in husband circle for given 1 hour a month visitation
8. Lack of faith in the legal system which means there is feeling that ther is not point in going to the legal systems.

The reality of the fact is that men are running away from the courts seeing that their rights are not protected and justice needs are not being met.

I am looking for reasons why people like you who claim are reasonable are not finding the central point of the story that is the person making such eailiy disproven false accusation

It is not enough to say person making false accusations should be punished but when it is proven to say that such and such person should also be proven .

The dialogue can occur when you do not try support those whose allegations are laughable and proven to be completely at fault.

When the innocents who have been exhonerated in dowry cases by courts say there is no point in filing. It is time to listen to them instead of trying to accuse them of something .Otherwise a pray that I went for dialogue is just that an empty statement.

If you had spent some time and gone through the thread in detail, you might hav bitten your words. Where is the proof of her falsehood? I am a neutral person.. welcoming both sides to present their story but if people like you despite physical absence have reached their conclusions before the courts have then all I can say is “get off the high horse and get real”. I would have been the first person to condemn her had there been any news of her having made ‘false claims’. Neutrality has its ethics..perhaps bias and prejudice will disallow that..alien to you?

Heard of the term ’substantiate’?

Though I am almost certain you are one of the Von siffers.. a term my friend Temporal has coined for misogynist ad hominem attackers of the SIF. yet I have included your comment.

Either prove your arguments or dont waste my time.

why are you not advocating that she be punished for misusing the law.

If you are “not certain on validity of her claims” inspite of seeing so much evidences. I can only pity you and pity India for having such citizens

Its time to revisit this news / story.

What happened to our Jhansi ki Rani “Tripti Nigam”?
Where is she and where is our poor Gaurav?

I too have come across exceptional conduct from police officers, and I should, in all fairness, have pointed that out. The trouble is that we often fail to recognise the good, and tend to over-emphasise the evil. That can only demoralise committed folks in the force, and wouldn’t be in the least fair.

But it is a fundamental fact that power without any oversight does tend to corrupt. We do have to keep this in mind.

Kavita read the SIF proposed “Domestic Harmony Act” instead of “Domestic Violence Act”.

Justice/Punishment as per crime the same can’t be defined by the LAW in some assumption .

We can’t underestimate media Power, where the trail by media is not a Punishable offence.
Regarding Kavita I would like to stick to the article about your this only, seek a correction in your heading , as Tripti herself withdran the case against Premji , hence her alligation does not justify :

‘Dating Allowance’ Ruined Marriage Alleges Tripti Nigam.

Rest upto you, truth can’t be hide so long.