LOl Sujoy… Want me to put in a word for you?

Neha..U 2 eh? yeah but your bit about putting it to better use is on the dot babe.

@ Toby..you have a valid point there.the link provided has given details of a few more like Akshay and hrithik. But in the final analysis I guess we can count them on the fingers of two hands at the most.Why India has produced only a handful of stars is worthy of debate. The reasons to me are obvious but the solution not anywhere in sight. Guaranteed box office returns is a BIG attraction for any producer, which the stars by mere presence in a film ensure. Since their fees is exorbitatnt a big budget is needed which ensures a better film in that sense. since the film normally recovers its cost the project is viable. Contrarily a ’starless film’ can at best summon up a modest budget which leads to restrictive creativity which further leads to a less than perfect or hugely mounted film which then does not garner enough collections at the B.O.

So the stars get starrier and the others remain in the periphery despite talent. Our masses are largely to blame. there arent enough connoisseurs of cinema without stars. So much like Corporate india where the rich get richer at the cost of the poor.. Bollywood is no different.

What you say Guys ??? Realize, lets see that they dont loot our pockets anymore, we have given our sizebale income to make these stars settle very well in their life, but what about others ?

Just give a thought !!!

he has paid an advance it tax for 27 crores. the highest ever by an actor i think.. wow.. this man is King.